Opinions & Experiences of the Philips HS8020 Coolskin Shaver

Philips HS8020 Coolskin Shaver Photograph

Shaver:

Philips HS8020 Coolskin Shaver

Average Customer Rating:
3.9 Out of 5 (18)
Power Source:
Rechargeable Only

More Details

Average Rating

3.5 out of 5

(based on 18 customer ratings)

18 Ratings at Shavers.co.uk
Rating ScorePercentage of RatingsNumber of Ratings
5 out of 555%(10)
4 out of 516%(3)
3 out of 55%(1)
2 out of 511%(2)
1 out of 511%(2)

See All Reviews For This Product

  • All
    Reviews (18)
  • Expert Reviews(0)
  • Featured Reviews(0)




  • Previous
  • 1
  • Next

Philips HS8020 Coolskin Shaver Reviews (1–3 of 18)

(Showing only reviews with 4 star ratings, display all ratings?)

4.0 Out of 5

Reviewer
graham - perth’s User Photograph
graham - perth

I bought this product initially as I was going into hospital and needed something that I could use whilst recovering from major op. I found it easy to use (in hosital bed), giving a good close shave and the nivea conditioner did what it said on the "box".

A good shave with no burning with a smooth finish I have continued to use it since coming home.

I have never liked shavers and I always said I would go back to my trusty gillette fusion power razor as it is the best shave I ever had, however the Coolskin has changed my mind.

+ Ease of use
+ Smooth finish
+ Cost effective

- 8hr charge for 30 min shaving time
- Lack of trimmer

Reviewed; 3rd July, 2009

4.0 Out of 5

Reviewer
J Travers’s User Photograph
J Travers

Good shaver but where do you get the refills from?? Neither boots etc seem to have the refills.

Reviewed; 6th January, 2008

4.0 Out of 5

Reviewer
John’s User Photograph
John

Best performing Philips shaver I’ve had. I particularly like the very thin shaving heads which make getting into difficult places much easier then with previous Philips shavers. The lotion comes up right in the middle of the heads and gives a really smooth shaving experience – and refilling it is a breeze. My only gripe is that there is no trimmer.

Reviewed; 4th October, 2007

  • Previous
  • 1
  • Next